sammi says

Farewell, "Heroes." I'm not shocked at all to learn that NBC has officially given "Heroes" the ax after 4 seasons. "Heroes" was a show that had absolutely the most potential to succeed but after one amazing season it lost all of its magic. Season one of "Heroes" stand alone is the some of the greatest TV in the last ten years. It had so much potential. Rich characters that we cared about with great backstories and even greater futures ahead of them.

It's such a shame that instead of focusing on these characters that we already knew and loved, the show's creators brought on too many new heroes and gave them too much screen time. The new heroes had interesting abilities but they didn't deserve to become season regulars. Why not just feature them in an episode or two? I think they wanted to capitalize on the success of the first season dealing with ordinary people coming to understand their superhuman abilities and went overboard. "Heroes" became boring and did very little to progress the stories of the characters we already liked.

I am sad that NBC has canceled "Mercy." This is totally not a show I would normally watch, but I caught the first episode and consistently wanted to see more. I usually overlook medical dramas because I find them unoriginal, but this one offered us a little more. My dad calls it the "poor man's 'Nurse Jackie'" which I find hilarious because it's kind of true. They both focus on no-bullshit nurses in New Jersey. "Mercy" doesn't push the line as much as "Nurse Jackie," but it still has some edge. The main character, Veronica, is an emotional wreck. She suffers from post traumatic stress disorder after serving in Iraq and is an alcoholic going through a divorce with her high school sweetheart all while dating a doctor at her hospital. This show had serious potential and I enjoyed it. I would have loved to have seen a second season especially after the cliffhanger season finale.

Another cancellation that hurts is "Flash Forward." I'm disappointed the show didn't catch on. I think it had a great premise but was maybe hindered by the fact that viewers don't know how the show could progress past the date the characters saw of the future. I agree, I don't know where they could take the show, it could have been another "Heroes" on our hands, but I enjoyed it. I don't know what kind of resolution we'll get in the remaining episodes but I'm sure it won't be a proper finish for a worthwhile show.

It consistently blows my mind that shows like "Minute to Win It," "The Marriage Ref," "The Bachelor," "Wife Swap," "Wipeout," "Undercover Boss," and any other contrived, cheap and ridiculous reality/competition show the networks can come up with get picked up over scripted TV shows. If "Chuck" hadn't been renewed for a fourth season, I'd really start to lose faith that the networks have any idea what people like to watch. Don't get me started on the whole ratings system. The whole thing is a bunch of nonsense the numbers are so flawed. With all the technology in today's world there's still no better way to track TV viewership than for a couple thousand households in our country to type in codes into a box? Please.

Shows like "Modern Family," "Glee," and even "The Vampire Diaries," give me hope for the future of network television...even though we all know cable's where it at.